Under the victim’s right of review procedure, Emily challenged the decision not to prosecute the man for voyeurism. In Emily’s case, the man accepted he had filmed her “in case he wanted to masturbate at some point”, it was also conceded that there was evidence he had filmed her without her consent. he knows that person does not consent to being observed for his sexual gratification.for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, he observes another person doing a private act, and.What is voyeurism?Ī person commits the offence of voyeurism if: Emily maintained that any sexual activity was not consensual but did not challenge the Prosecution decision not to charge the man with rape. The Crown Prosecution Service did not authorise any charge, either for rape or voyeurism. Although she is entitled to anonymity, she waived that right to draw attention to her case. She had also been filmed, naked and asleep, without her consent. In 2015 Emily Hunt complained to the police that she had been raped in a hotel room. ![]() ![]() Covert Filming of Sexual Activity and the Law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |